The EU 'cyber security' Agency ENISA, i.e. the European Network and Information Security Agency, launched a new report on barriers to and incentives for cyber security information sharing. The report shows e.g. that the economic incentives are much more important for practitioners than what academic literature indicate.
The importance of information sharing for the Critical Information Infrastructure Protection -CIIPis widely acknowledged by policymakers, technical and practitioner communities alike. The Agency has researched peertopeer groups, e.g. Information Exchanges (IEs) and Information Sharing Analysis Centres (ISACs). The report identifies the most important barriers and incentives in daytoday practice in IEs and ISACs for CIIP. This research differs from other reports by being focused on the practitioners' experiences. The material stems from three sources, literature analysis, interviews, and a tworound 'Delphi' exercise with security professionals.
The report is launched in conjunction with the top level NIS Summer School, taking place 13-17 September, in Crete.
Many of the barriers and incentives identified in literature are of low importance to practitioners and security officials working in IEs. The 'real' list of incentives for practitioners is instead: economic incentives (i.e. cost savings), incentives of quality, value, and use of information shared. Main barriers to sharing information are poor quality information, poor management, and/or reputational risks.
The Agency has produced 20 recommendations to different target audiences, e.g.:
- Member States should establish a national information sharing platform and cooperate with other Member States.
- Private sector should be more transparent in sharing information, improve preparedness measures based on information exchanged
- Research and Academia should quantify the benefits and costs of participating in platforms; undertaking casestudy research into where attacks might have been prevented, or their impact lessened.
- The EU Institutions and ENISA should establish a pan European information sharing platform for Member States and private stakeholders. The EU Commission's European Public Private Partnership for Resilience (EP3R) is the main policy initiative in this area.
The Executive Director of ENISA, Dr Udo Helmbrecht, comments:
"Information sharing is a corner stone to improve the protection of critical information infrastructure-CIIP, which is vital for Europe's economy and communications within Europe".
Background: For full report, including all recommendations
http://www.enisa.europa.eu/...
For interviews: Pls contact Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis, Senior Expert- Network Security Policies: resiliencepolicies@enisa.europa.eu or Ulf Bergstrom, Spokesman, ENISA, press@enisa.europa.eu, Mobile: + 30 6948 460143
http://www.enisa.europa.eu
The importance of information sharing for the Critical Information Infrastructure Protection -CIIPis widely acknowledged by policymakers, technical and practitioner communities alike. The Agency has researched peertopeer groups, e.g. Information Exchanges (IEs) and Information Sharing Analysis Centres (ISACs). The report identifies the most important barriers and incentives in daytoday practice in IEs and ISACs for CIIP. This research differs from other reports by being focused on the practitioners' experiences. The material stems from three sources, literature analysis, interviews, and a tworound 'Delphi' exercise with security professionals.
The report is launched in conjunction with the top level NIS Summer School, taking place 13-17 September, in Crete.
Many of the barriers and incentives identified in literature are of low importance to practitioners and security officials working in IEs. The 'real' list of incentives for practitioners is instead: economic incentives (i.e. cost savings), incentives of quality, value, and use of information shared. Main barriers to sharing information are poor quality information, poor management, and/or reputational risks.
The Agency has produced 20 recommendations to different target audiences, e.g.:
- Member States should establish a national information sharing platform and cooperate with other Member States.
- Private sector should be more transparent in sharing information, improve preparedness measures based on information exchanged
- Research and Academia should quantify the benefits and costs of participating in platforms; undertaking casestudy research into where attacks might have been prevented, or their impact lessened.
- The EU Institutions and ENISA should establish a pan European information sharing platform for Member States and private stakeholders. The EU Commission's European Public Private Partnership for Resilience (EP3R) is the main policy initiative in this area.
The Executive Director of ENISA, Dr Udo Helmbrecht, comments:
"Information sharing is a corner stone to improve the protection of critical information infrastructure-CIIP, which is vital for Europe's economy and communications within Europe".
Background: For full report, including all recommendations
http://www.enisa.europa.eu/...
For interviews: Pls contact Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis, Senior Expert- Network Security Policies: resiliencepolicies@enisa.europa.eu or Ulf Bergstrom, Spokesman, ENISA, press@enisa.europa.eu, Mobile: + 30 6948 460143
http://www.enisa.europa.eu
